PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIONS STAFF UNION versus N.I.R.C., ISLAMABAD
Sections 22 and 22 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 and the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 referendum, which failed the referendum, filed an objection to the National Industrial Relations Commission regarding illegal and irregularities. ? Through an alleged objection to the Returning Officer's request, the union filed a constitutional petition before the High Court challenging the referendum with the observation that the National Industrial Relations Commission was scheduled for a next hearing. The union will try to oust the objection request. , The Union shall be free to take advantage of the provisions provided under the law; the National Industrial Relations Commission, subject to all these exceptions, did not decide on the request of the Union's objection under the High Court order, the defendant's union before the High Court. A constitutional petition was filed in which he received the proceedings. The pendant's admission before the National Industrial Relations Commission was not justified in preventing the High Court from proceeding through its interlocutory provisions which were approved in the constitutional petition filed by the Respondent Union, as previously filed by the applicant's union. The constitutional petition filed by the High Court was approved. The High Court was directed to dismiss the petitioner's request for a suspended Union Order objection before the National Industrial Relations Commission, which was approved by the Respondent's Constitutional Petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Kamalia Musa lawyer