Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN versus SAWAL KHAN

The property purchased by the plaintiffs through the declaration for a specific relief Act 1877 sections 42 and 54 and the contract for sale of a permanent restricted property was in their immovable farming, while the entire property was also recorded in the name of the claimant at the time of its purchase. I was admitted The entire property was finalized without any notice from the claimants behind their back and the plaintiff was named in the name of the claimant, not just their names on the contract of sale in connection with the property in dispute. Implementation was proved, but oral and documentary evidence proved that the possession of farming on their property was removed from their names in violation of the principle of natural justice in the legal possession of the defendants, by the plaintiffs. The lawsuit, which was timely, was rightly decided by the trial court. Favor jobs for fresh advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer