Find a Lawyer

AYESHA MARYAM versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, GUJRANWALA

R11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for re-disclosure of the respondent present on dissatisfaction with Physics papers in the Educational Institution FC (Pre-Medical) Examination, applied for re-examination to its authority. Something went wrong. Part of the examiner in the marking, said that the paper sent the paper to the examiner, but after receiving the same without any change in the marks, the informed candidate claimed that out of the nineteen sections of the objective question. , He tried seventeen parts of it that had paper. The dispute was sent back for re-examination, stating that there was no doubt that the candidate correctly answered ten of the 19 questions in the dispute, but after the paperwork was marked, the candidate Had tried to report to other examiners who were from different boards of education the effect is that ten of the nineteen questions were answered by candidate candidate candidate. The mark did not seem to be correct, after re-examining the paper it was necessary to correct it by giving the appropriate number while the authority's position was That the board of review in the absence of supply of any kind of education. According to the paper, no direction can be issued to the examiner. The candidate's case was not a re-examination of the answer book, but rather to identify the objective question, which was in the nature of mathematical calculation, which was answered correctly or May be inaccurate and traces should be allocated for these questions or not at all. immigration advocates phone number from Nowshera lawyer