Find a Lawyer

JAHANGIR versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 426 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Sanctions Law Enforcement Act (IX of 1974), Section 5 suspension of sentence that appealed against his conviction and sentence An application was submitted for The trial court alleges that there was a difference in the first information report filed by the complainant and in the private complaint submitted, seven of the eight accused were acquitted and only one accused was made age based on the testimony of the prosecution. The prisoner was sentenced. The witness was closely related and interested and no credible evidence was presented by the prosecution, the accused challenged the prosecution's witness's presence on the occasion, and the trial court concluded in its judgment that the accused had Neither the gun was recovered nor the vacancy was recovered. In the circumstances, there was a valid case where the sentence is at discretion for suspension. It can be used in favor of the accused while accepting the plea of the accused. The sentence handed down by him was suspended until the final settlement of his appeal famous lower court advocate from Wana lawyer