Find a Lawyer

ADVOCATE-GENERAL, SINDH versus ABDUL SATTAR

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bail of the Additional Sessions Judge, granted the bail, did not state that he was a session judge. How to authorize legal action on behalf of During his extraordinary absence, the order was granted by the Additional Sessions Judge without any jurisdiction. The bail has been granted by the Sessions Judge to the two co-accused in the case. Should be dealt with by the session judge instead. Judge parties know each other, there was no possibility of misidentification of the accused, which the trial court presented as distorting the facts, the specific accused was assigned to the accused and the case against him was filed in section 497. (1), the CR prediction clause came into force. The PC made no temporary finding of the absence of grounds to believe that the accused was guilty, was recorded by the trial court, and, as such the impugned order was clearly illegal and without any The jurisdiction of the accused accused has been revoked under certain circumstances divorce advocates from Bannu lawyer