Find a Lawyer

DHANI BUX versus STATE

Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979 Section 497 (1), Third and Fourth Section Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), 5 353 / 324/149 The bail suspect armed with deadly weapons at the bank, bank staff and guards on duty, and after snatching their weapons, more than Rs. 36 lakh and other valuable articles were seized at the tip of the arms. Has entered Fear of death The accused had wrongfully withheld the bank staff while committing the robbery and detained the manager and cashier in the strong room or the bank FIR was immediately registered and the police had registered the bank staff. The accused followed and arrested the accused after an encounter. During the day, the suspect was identified by the Bank Staff Manor with weapons, ammunition and cash stolen, which allegedly committed the crime, which undoubtedly indicated that the accused was inactive, Frustrated and dangerous criminals and their actions are equivalent to terrorism, therefore, Section 497 (1) was not entitled to take advantage of the third provision, CRPC was different and distinguished from the co-accused on trial. The consistency rule was not available for, the accused was denied on bail law firms from Wahi hassain lawyer