Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NASEER AHMED versus STATE


Sections 5, 6 and 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act of 1975 (v. 1898), Section 561A Quitting Action Police Report remained silent on the details of the time and place of the commission of the accused's actions. The fact that the accused was subjected to a trial in some cases or was a former offender under the provisions of section 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975, to prevent the prosecution of the accused. No one could be attracted. The number of cases neither the accused nor the accused as a previous offender would have been reduced to the requirements contained in ss. 5 and 6 of the said Act, which would have resulted in the termination of section 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 Is pending against the accused. Under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Sheikhupura lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.