Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN. versus STATE

The pre-arrest bail, section 465/468/471 pre-arrest bail, section 465/468/471, was filed by the accused before the grant of the petition, it was dismissed by the trial court and the accused himself. Instead of surrendering to the court or hearing the petition to the police. Prior to arrest he was not present in the city at the date of the incident as he went to another city and was charged in the FIR and forged and fabricated a Bogus Motor Registration Certificate against him. Serious selling charges were made. The fake certificate was made public, it was related to the crimes registered in the FIR and he could not be charged with any dishonesty against the police. He could have been incensed during the investigation before the police or at the time of trial. In such tick cases, bail should not have been granted as usual before arrest unless there was strong evidence that the person was being maliciously punished. Or if Malala's utility and no allegations of illegal involvement were due to police misconduct, the accused could not be entered into pre-arrest bail. advocate from Takhtbai lawyer