Find a Lawyer

HINA EXPORT COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. versus ZAHID ALI

Companies Ordinance 1984 Sections 50 (2), 73, 159 (7), 178, 179 and 187 (41 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908)), OLXX, RL & 2 Specific Relief Act (II of 1877) ), Section 42 and declaration Plaintiff / Applicant filed for trial and permanent injunction in their case praying that the defendant chose the directors of the company in violation of the provisions of the Companies Ordinance 1984 1984 1984 Was, to be declared illegal, the plaintiff also filed a grant application. There is evidence that the effect of the interim injunction that the defendant / defendant should be banned from holding a board meeting of directors or to be presented to any committee of directors during the approval of the suit In addition to non-compliance, the articles of association were violated. As is the case with the selection of directors as alleged by the plaintiff / applicant Prima facie, the task of the court was to ensure that a company operates smoothly and efficiently, as well as not for any Allowing members, directors or even shareholders to violate the provisions of the Memorandum and Articles of Association or Company Ordinance, the plaintiff / applicant of 1984 successfully established a good first case for interim injunction That means irreparable harm to the plaintiff and the balance of injury and convenience is also the plaintiff / defendant. Was in favor of the complainant, until the final decision of the case the interim order was granted to the plaintiff / applicant. power of attorney advocate Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer