Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMED MALIK versus SIBQUAT HAYAT GHANI

The dispute regarding the ownership of the shops in the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 questions and the business is ongoing The plaintiff in the stores states that he had purchased the shops from his fund and established a business in it, No cross-inspection was made at this point, despite being presented to the defenders on occasion. Defendant did not present any evidence in support of his claim that he was the owner of the property he owned nor did he file any documentation in support of it. The plaintiff pleads that he did not appoint defendant as his lawyer, he became an unlawful plaintiff, so he seized and obtained the authority of a lawyer in a fraudulent manner through a certified oral and submitted by the plaintiff. The documentary evidence also clearly proved that the plaintiff had funded the purchase of the property under question from his own pocket and that the defendant had fraudulently purchased some of the property on his own. (Seller) was canceled in the name of the original defendant, it was directed to present the same to the plaintiff. And was the legitimate owner of the legitimate property and was entitled to the registration of such property itself. pakistani advocates Mangal Sada lawyer