WAZIR ALI versus HAMIDA NIZAMUDDIN
Section 17 (2) (ii) (a) of the Cantonment Rental Restriction Act 1963 allowed the tenant to move out of the house on the basis that the tenant had sufficient space in the dispute without the landlord's consent or consent. The landlord did not produce any oral or documentary film. To provide evidence that the tenant had occupied the home or received a commission in the dispute for some consideration. The tenant who allegedly gave the landlord more or less than all the tenants cannot be charged with any kind of permission unless it is proved that the lease / tenant has rented premises. Participated in the legal possession of the land, so it is true that either the relative or the employee was allowed to use the premises in the dispute by the tenant while the lease / tenant retained legal possession, the tenant's confusion and the contents Without the subplot, it would not be enough to make the lease against the tenant, depending on the slabling order, R will not be
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Kasur lawyer