Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN

XLI, XL, R 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Civil Procedure Code Order of CPC Appeals from the original rules of the money sanctioned against the creditor of the deposit petition / decision of the money imposed in the court The order for recovery was challenged. The petitioner directed the applicant to submit an unclosed amount in court before the High Court, after which the applicant submitted the amendment decree in the High Court and directed the applicant to amend the balance order. Accordingly, under the provisions of OL XI, R 8, CPC, it was at its discretion, in the case of a court order for payment of money, to pass orders to submit a surplus or to present security for payment. The High Court, for the facts and matters of the case, approved the cash deposit orders, which I can't take any exception. Generally, the Supreme Court will not interfere with the formal High Court orders except in exceptional circumstances, which are lacking in the applicant's case. In order to protect the rights of both parties, the defendants were instructed to give the applicant an undisclosed refund if the appeal was allowed by the High Court. immigration advocates email from Hunza Nagar lawyer