MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus LIQUAT DAWOOD KUKDA
Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 and 15 (2) (ii) of the default documents in payment of rent for residential premises have proved that the tenant offered the disputed rent to an old legal tenant, but the house The landlord refuses to receive it upon the owner's refusal. The tenant, the tenant rent through a money order that the landlord denied the money orders and consequently the tenant returned to the tenant to pay his legal obligation, eventually to rent the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979. According to the provisions of Section 10 of the Dard, the rent has been deposited in the court. In the circumstances, the payment of rent did not deliberately commit the default and the rent controller ordered the eviction of the tenant on the basis of default in payment of rent.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Kamalia lawyer