Find a Lawyer

PEACE DEVELOPERS versus KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION

Grant in its Claim for Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RRL & 2 Suite Declaration and Permanent Order Transfer Order, Plaintiff / Applicant's Grant Applied for the impression of the interim order that the defendants / respondents by evicting the applicant or demolishing the buildings to be taken against the applicant in accordance with the plan approved in connection with the controversial building. Any strict action to be banned was initially approved by the Building Control Authority. Request for permission to lift the ground, ground floor plus four upper floors and then lift three more floors and complete the cut line as stated in the future and when the road widening work was started. The cut line was supposed to be retained after demolition. The respondents Building Control Authority's expenditure approved for additional project e-floors and cut line, but was not objected to by the Metropolitan Corporation on the cut line Applicant did not get approval from MetroPolitan Corporation Nor obtained any objection certificate, which was a prerequisite for the approval of the additional building project and raised the construction on the cut line, which was approved by the Metropolitan Corporation on the objection to the construction on the cut line by the applicants. Cannot be declared because of building projects One of the key terms attached was that the applicant / applicant was not complied with, in the circumstances, in the case property advocate from Bolan lawyer