Find a Lawyer

QAMARUL ISLAM versus INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF PAKISTAN

Revision of the Decisions of Accessories of Civil Code 1908A XLVII, R1 and Section 114 High Court O XLVII, the person affected in R1 can apply for a judgment or order review when a new and important case is discovered. ? Or evidence that, after careful practice, he was not aware of or could not be presented by the time the order was passed or at the time of the order, or had suffered any error or omission in front of the record or to some extent Was. The approval of the arguments submitted by the applicants indicated that the conditions presented for review for review were not shown in the judgment. The original petitioner's request was that the courts and the High Court The conclusions given were incorrect based on the evidence when reviewed. Only false and false will be falsified to correct, even in the face of the record, wrong decisions cannot be the basis of self-review because in Law Two it cannot be declared a mistake. The following courts yielded concurrent results, therefore, the High Court could not interfere in these conclusions, unless there was a strong case for interference, nothing was shown by the applicant under which There was an error or omission through the record. The High Court may be reviewed famous high court advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer