KHAN MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), All precautions were taken while recording the confessional statements of the accused while examining the magistrate's confession of proof of section 164 and all these formal procedures. Under whom it was conceived, it faithfully complied. Section 4 364, CCP is not credible that the magistrate, who was well acquainted with the law, swore before the accused before recording his statements, and that Baqir Salah was written as usual and in fact some kind of delay. Was not done The confession cannot be the same negation in the recording of the crime itself, otherwise it would have been voluntarily proved on the record that even the voluntary nature of the accused's confession cannot be doubted, which is sufficient for the recovery of blood-stained clothing, land. Standing to the limit. And the arsenal of weapons also proved on record against the conviction and sentence of the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Jaffarabad lawyer