LIAQAT ALI ALIAS KALU versus THE STATE
The complainant was not only the brother of the deceased, but was also handled illegally by the accused, complimenting the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 evidence that the complainant admitted that a criminal case was registered against him in any case against the deceased. In which the accused was also involved. The witness, who was unable to bring anything on record to prove the cause of the deceased's presence at the time of the incident, as he lived several miles from the location of the incident, could not even find the complainant's name in the site plan. , Who belonged to the defendant and also the complainant, a witness who did not confirm the cause of the incident near his presence at the relevant time, said that the witness's residence was located near the scene of the incident. Was not even A capital charge that failed to satisfy the cause, usually when he was, it was not expected that his presence was claimed that the prosecution had failed to prove that purpose, as it had established. The empty recovered from the scene did not match the gun allegedly recovered from the accused. Medical evidence was only supported in nature where witnesses were also present. Failure to inspire trust, nothing could be supported by medical evidence. Prosecutor failed to prove his case against the suspects without suspension, the accused was acquitted on the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Swat lawyer