SANA ULLAH KHAN GANDAPUR, ADVOCATE versus MUHAMMAD LQBAL KHAN KUNDI, ADVOCATE
5, 6, 10, 61, 64 and 66 Election of a member of the NWFP Bar Council challenging the selection of a retired candidate as a member of the Bar Council was challenged on the basis that the nomination papers Illegally returned. According to the election schedule, the candidate had indicated that the nomination papers would be submitted to the Returning Officer's office before the due date for submission of nomination papers, while the candidates along with other candidates had submitted their nomination papers. ? A day after the due date for filing nominations, the senior civil judge / polling officer sent his papers to the nominee acknowledging the delay in filing nomination papers. The senior civil judge accepted the nomination papers by the Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar. The officer was not empowered to receive the papers nomination under Councils Rules, 1976, especially when nothing was on record to indicate that the returning officer had authorized the senior civil judge to receive the papers nomination. , Nomination papers by the retired candidate in the Returning Officer's office Not only was the submission a technical impediment, but it was also a violation of some explicit mandatory provisions of the Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules 1976, which ultimately resulted in the election officer's acceptance of the nomination papers for the Returning Officer after the congressional delay. Was not sustainable, and was the choice of returning candidate. Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Roll 1976 RR66 Applicant / Candidate Rights
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Swat lawyer