Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 409/34 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) was based on conviction and guilt because direct evidence of misuse or theft against the accused was not available. From the record to suggest that the suspect in question was abusing the oil in question, however, it would probably not be enough to prove that the defendant was looking for evidence of the trial court's crime and both versions of the warrant and Data was not available. The record in the court was that through careful and thorough analysis, the grain had to be separated from the straw and it would have to take advantage of the doubt, no matter how trivial it may be, for the accused, no matter how innocent the person. To be prosecuted, the prosecution didn't have to stand on its own. Legs, but also to overcome his suspicion, to prove his case against the accused, to achieve its merits and to resolve every doubt, that the accused had failed in favor of prosecution beyond any doubt. To prove his case, the trial court had set aside the sentence awarded by the trial court, and in the circumstances of the trial, the accused was acquitted of the charge by giving him the benefit of the doubt. best advocate from Tharo Shah lawyer