Find a Lawyer

PARVEEN AKHTAR versus MUHAMMAD JAMEEL

Civil Procedure Code Order VII of CPC Plants O VII, R 11 and Section 115 was dismissed for dismissal of the plaintiff's application for dismissal of the plaintiff when the evidence in the affidavit on all the plaintiffs' matters was completed and the defendant Needs to present their evidence. Such a plea was rejected by the trial court. The trial court was fully justified in rejecting the application under R VII, R 11, for the defendant, the CPC sought to extend the proceedings by bringing the interim order at the time of the High Court, and upon the dismissal of the claimant again. It was considered at this stage that when the court did not enter evidence in the case for dismissal of the trial, even in the initial phase when the plaintiff did not present any evidence in support of his case, it was possible. When the court considers the statement containing the plaintiff and other material contained in the record. Such a conclusion was reached that the plaintiff was unable to present a case for refusal to dismiss the case, therefore, there was no interference with the admissibility order in which the trial court refused to dismiss the plaintiff. Had done best advocate from Sehwan lawyer