SAHIB KHAN versus THE STATE
The testimony of the prosecution witnesses made contradictory statements at the time of the incident, the prosecution's witness was the first cousin of the complainant / prosecutor's witness and both the prosecution witnesses were not only interested witnesses but each The main aspect of the case and his account of the account was not found in the evidence that the set was not sent to the forensic science laboratory because of the evidence of the alleged rifle recovery. The prosecution's witness recovered the empty cartridge for comparison. There were 15/16 shops around the scene and some shopkeepers also witnessed the incident and their statements were recorded by police, but none of the shopkeepers were cited as witnesses. Was or was not examined in court. Either the evidence was not verified by medical evidence or by the evidence of recovery, the prosecution failed to reach the accused accused of the suspect in addition to any doubt, conviction and sentence, and he Was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Hariwala lawyer