Find a Lawyer

BENAZIR BHUTTO versus STATE

The defendant's plea to distributing personal attendance before the denial of the Accountability Bench, sections 10 and 26 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1997 (V 1898), sections 353, 205 and 561, was going abroad with the permission of the appellate court, The passport was returned by the Accountability Bench and the appellant was present in the court as instructed by the court; no instances were shown in the records of the two provinces after adjusting the dates of hearing in the pending cases against them. That the appellant was required to appear before the court and she failed to do so but for her own example, LA police chief was a part of the same test during the absence, though it promised the appellant by a lawyer when he would appear in court. It is necessary to do this and in his absence his lawyer's panel will attend the Court of Appeal, which is held, he was not disposed to consider his plea by the Ehsanbah Bench regarding his qualifications. In the circumstances, the trial bench may direct the appellant's personal attendance at any stage of the process at his discretion and, if necessary, take appropriate steps to attend to the interests of justice. law firms from Nankana Sahib lawyer