MUHAMMAD AZHAR, BUTT versus ANIS AHMED KHAWAJA
Sindh Claimed Premises Ordinance 1979 Claims multiple claimants for a fixed fixed disputed property in payment of Section 15 and 21 monthly rent, one claiming to be the custom of the deceased owner, while the other claimant / defendant The appellant / tenant deposit rental court in the court against the joint names of their claimant rent controller did not make any temporary rental order, nor did Nazir's report consider the entire reserves. And neither the date nor the permission to validate the withdrawal request Or has had, it was difficult to choose between the two for the situation in appealing a / rent and, in the circumstances, was only one course for the tenant that he submitted to the court fare. As such, deliberately defaults
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer
