SHAMIM ARA OMRAO versus SAEED AKBAR
The Limitation Act 1908 Article 144 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O: XXXIX, Rr l & 2 The provisional order of the prima facie case was sufficient to demonstrate that the prohibition of negative possession was in the player publicity and to a large extent. The occupation was competitively contested, the standard of durability and durability that could qualify for negative possession was appellant / plaintiff absent in an illegal case as notices were issued to the appellant / plaintiff to remove the encroachment and clear the disputed land. Went to The plaintiff was unable to demonstrate that he was acquiring legal and unlawful possession of the suit, if in the absence of any legal right, the interim / plaintiff's preliminary injunction could not be dismissed by the trial court. No interference is guaranteed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Swat lawyer