Find a Lawyer

ALI ASGHAR SHAH versus STATE

The testimony of Sections 2302 and 7 Pro7 Criminal Code (v. 1898), the testimony of Section 59 evidence at the scene was satisfactory and natural, and the ocular testimony of all the relevant circumstances was reliable and affirmative. The injured witness was confirmed. Medical evidence fully supported the ocular version, the recovery of a pistol with three live cartridges from the accused proved that the ballistic expert's firing on the victim was positive and that the witness against the injured lawyer was charged with Section 342, CRP. Under C, his statement was not disputed. When the prosecution was placed in the adjoining premises with evidence of professional prosecution, it was confessed and in the subsequent case the accused declared a confessional offense for injuring the prosecution witness, It was permissible to follow and arrest the accused committed criminal misconduct and was not entitled to any benefit under section 59 (l), based on a correct and complete appreciation of the court's findings under CRPC. Being open to no exceptions as the appeal was dismissed. advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer