BENAZIR BHUTTO, M.N.A., LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION, BIIAWAL HOUSE, KARACHI versus STATE
Accountability Act 1997 Section 24 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 187 (1) Supreme Court Rules, 1,980, and XXXIII, R 6 Section 26, Direct appeal before the Accountability Bench in the Supreme Court under the Accountability Act 1997 Had given a personal appearance when she was abroad while the accused were appealed against the same decision and the Supreme Court was to examine the legality of the conviction and punishment given by the Accountability Bench in the disadvantaged. If the decision can be litigated against an overseas applicant and a valid decision can be made in his absence, no one can entertain his / her appeal in his / her absence. There can be no restriction, especially when the Supreme Court has been empowered to direct production at any stage of the appeal hearing, if it is in the interest of justice and the failure of the appellant to appear in court, if required. If you feel like it, you have to face it. Legal consequences In the absence of the Appellant by the Supreme Court, the appeal will not be entertained, therefore, the misuse of the law procedure, in which case the Appellant has the right to entertain his appeal and to have it entertained by his own. Can't lose the truth In view of the strange facts and the circumstances of the matter
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Punch lawyer