Find a Lawyer

DPO CHINIOT versus MUHAMMAD AYUB

Arts 23 and 2 (xii) Launch of proceedings against the Sub Inspector Authorized Authority Scope District Police Officer (DPO) The initiation of proceedings against the Sub Inspector / Respondent Service Tribunal primarily allows the sub inspector's appeal. The authority to initiate proceedings against them was territorial. The Police Officer (RPO) is violating the Police Order of the Legality Order of Service Tribunal Arts 23 and 2 (xii); the right to prosecute a sub-inspector in 2002 by an appeal by the Budget District Police Officer (DPO). The leave application was changed in approval and allowed, the unclean decision was set aside and the appeal filed by the sub-inspector was considered pending before the service tribunal, which was decided on the next merit. Had to go

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• AZHAR IQBAL v. State 2013 SCMR 383
• GHULAM AHMED CHISHTI v. State 2013 SCMR 385
• MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ v. THE STATE through P.G. Punjab 2013 PLD 386
• FARMAN ALI v. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ 2013 PLD 392
• NIAZ RASOOL through Muhammad Bilal v. Mst. PARVEEN IKRAM 2013 SCMR 397
• DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN 2013 PLD 401
• DIRECTOR CITY CIRCLE GEPCO LTD. v. SHAHID MIR 2013 PLD 403
• WORKERS PARTY PAKISTAN through General Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 406

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

divorce advocates from Ranipur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes