Find a Lawyer

KHUDA BAKHSH versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, C.D.A.

Capital Development Authority Ordinance 1960 Section 2 (k) [as amended by Capital Development Authority (Amendment) Ordinance (I of 1996)] Land Acquisition Act (Constitution of 1894), Sections 23 and 24 acquisition of land by the Market Value Authority Refused to do so. In relation to the land compensation recorded in the Revenue Record, in relation to the land compensation received under the provisions of the Capital Development Authority Ordinance, 1960, the owners claim the disputed award of so many rights that the land market value is calculated according to Should have done Under the provisions of Sections 23 and 24 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the authorities concerned have the authority under this Act, keeping in view the probable value of the land appropriation authorities, while determining the amount of land compensation paid to the owners. Which is contained in section 2 (k). The Capital Development Authority Ordinance, 1960, therefore, authorities were not, at that time, bound to take into account the potential value of underground land. In the absence of any law awarding me compensation, the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and 24, cannot be served in the service of the owners of the acquired land, with the former effect. Under the provisions of the Capital Development Authority Ordinance, 1960, the value of the land market, which does not appear to be in violation of the law, cannot be interfered with. best advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer