Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD TAHIR-UL-QADRI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY M/O LAW, ISLAMABAD

Latex of a person holding dual citizenship to file a constitutional petition challenging the Constitution of the Election Commission of Pakistan under Articles 184 (3) of the Articles 218, 63 (1) (c) and 184 (3) of the Constitution. Standby was unsuccessful. Making a case for exercising the discretionary jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, since the violation of any fundamental rights under Chapter 1 of Part II was not filed in the petition and Nor was it established during arguments. The petitioner had also failed to prove his courage to accept the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and it was also stated with the fact that in the petition he had no one to claim relief as a prayer. Lux is not standalone because, as a dual holder of citizenship, he was not eligible to contest the elections in Parliament in view of the constitutional bar under Article 63 (1) (c) of the Constitution. National requests were dismissed in the circumstances

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• DIRECTOR CITY CIRCLE GEPCO LTD. v. SHAHID MIR 2013 PLD 403
• WORKERS PARTY PAKISTAN through General Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 406
• Dr. MUHAMMAD TAHIR-UL-QADRI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o Law, Islamabad 2013 PLD 413
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.16 OF 2011 ALONG WITH CMAs 2013 PLD 443
• MUHAMMAD YAR v. MUHAMMAD AMIN 2013 SCMR 464
• Rao ABDUL JABBAR KHAN v. LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE 2013 PLD 472
• NASRULLAH KHAN v. MUKHTAR-UL-HASSAN 2013 PLD 478
• MAKKAH WOOD BASED PANELS v. G.M. SUI GAS PIPELINE LTD. 2013 SCMR 478

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Daud Khel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes