ABDUL HAMEED, NAIB-QASID versus SECRETARY, LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY
Section 42 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, which was upheld by the respondents before the Supreme Court, was upheld and argued, but this point was decided in the appeal. Not mentioned and raised for it. In the first appeal, the validity of the Supreme Court law, which reached the root of the case, was also allowed to arise during the arguments and it could be raised properly if it is properly in the memorandum of appeal or a brief statement. Have been included in
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer
