Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR ALI SHAIKH versus STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 5 365 A / 34 Definition of Evidence Complainant, the alleged abductor and the prosecution witnesses proved the abduction evidence against the accused, according to the complainant, one of the accused went into the shop In his statement to the nephew (the kidnapper), the accused prosecution witness supported the facts of the abduction and clearly identified the accused, who was armed with Kalashnikov at the time of the abduction, and the chief prosecutor in his examination. Another witness also identified the suspect as one of the kidnappers. Chief was indicted suspect in mthan who had demanded a ransom from her and was talking on the phone were recovered from the suspect's home ransom money and other articles. The father of the abductor accused was identified by the witnesses in the identification parade as valid evidence, which was brought to the record against the accused who survived the trial, it could be said that the trial court erred in acquitting him. The Kiwi kidnappers also told the story of their abduction and release of the prosecutor correctly, in which case, beyond any shadow, the case against the accused was completely proved. Under Section 656565A / under 34 under any provision, the PPC was undoubtedly the death sentence that the accused was convicted of, but as the accused faced a lengthy trial, Therefore, the sentence of life imprisonment will end justice and the accused has been acquitted. Sentenced to life imprisonment under the circumstances when you need a advocate from Kallur Kot lawyer