MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus YUSUF SHAH
The time for extension of the provisions of Articles 14 and 21 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Presidency Act 1993, extension of the order of pre-emptive RJ fifth submission to the Plaintiff / Former Ambassador Zarai Fifth, has been requested to extend the date on the date of submission. Extends the date. Extended time and also permission to offer security bonds to the plaintiff. Such a trial court order was challenged by the shopkeeper because it was not permissible for the trial court to extend the time to submit damages or to submit a security bond because no proper reason was disclosed by the advance umpire. For extension of time Section 21 (4), the provision of legal status of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Parade Purchase Act 1993 was mandatory in nature under which the court is bound to dismiss the plaintiff in the absence of good cause. If the order of submission of a gold coin or security deposit is expected to violate the discretionary powers of the court under Article 21 (4) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Parade Purchase Act, 1993, the use of these voices by the courts Will be The preliminary rule, however, was that the plaintiff / former umpire was expected to explain her failure to comply with a court order in which the reason for the extension of her prayer was disclosed. The trial court granted extension time to collect the security bonds without any proper purpose; the trial court was set aside in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Choppar Hatta lawyer