Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 337 F (iii) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 369 and 561 A Qu, The decision not to admit a person to the court was not admissible in the eyes of the law. ? And the trial court could not be granted jurisdiction to prosecute the accused immediately. Otherwise, after recording the verdict, the trial court became a fictitious offender and the aforesaid decision changed. After that the order of punishment could not be changed. In view of the provisions of section 696969, the PCD dead person was convicted and punished by an invalid order and three other persons who were never summoned, who are being tried or prosecuted by the trial court. Was convicted in this case, which can be pronounced. Misuse of a court process or law procedure does not remove the availability of any other remedies provided by the Code for criminal remedies inherent in the High Court. Such negligence was brought to his notice by the court or the process of law or where the High Court deemed it necessary to intervene in the matter in order to secure the acquisition of the Supreme Court, an improper order passed by the trial court. Was kept accordingly. jobs for fresh advocates from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer