TAJ MUHAMMAD versus STATE
The validity of the evidence has proved that there was no precedent between the parties in the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 337 F (i) [as amended by the Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Ordinance (XII of 1993]). The rivalry did not exist, and the complaining party itself did not. Work to promote the end of the incident because the complaining party had to get their own means of throwing away the kerosene so that their land could be irrigated and thus they deliberately used it. Threw it on the headset. The direct indictment of the accused was not available that the victim's murder was committed on an unimportant part of his body and was never repeated, and the other witnesses of the prosecution were not shot. The defendant's conviction was upheld against the accused and proved on record, but the defendant was sentenced according to the circumstances of the trial, according to which the sentence was reduced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Sakardu lawyer
