Find a Lawyer

SAJJAD HYDER versus STATE

Reference to the case of minor accused by section 68 (2) and 94 of the Sindh Children Act 1955 (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/504/34 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 439 Appropriate orders to the government The accused, who was modest at the time of the offense, challenged the trial court's decision that it deemed it appropriate for the provincial government to pass appropriate orders under section 68 (2) of the Sindh Children Act 1955. In the absence of any final order under Section 4 under the said Act, but the same which was filed within time, it was revised and disposed of under Section 943 Cr, CRPC. Because such an accused has crossed the age of 18 at the time of passing. In the absence of a clear and clear finding of the trial court's neglect and the plaintiff's finding of a baseless and despondent person, he cannot be bound by a certified school nor detained in a safe place. , Nor can any sentence be imposed in the Central Jail, nor even the provincial government had the authority to pass a detention order beyond the age of 18, resulting in the trial court's decision. One was set aside and the accused released. when you need a advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer