Find a Lawyer

SHAHMAND versus STATE

The appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) evidence was sufficient to prove that the trial court's decision was based on speculation and speculation to link the accused to the incident which was not known. That he was shot dead. The trial court did not pass any order to allow the prosecutor to present secondary evidence in connection with the Identity Parade report, as the photostat of the said report had no legal value, otherwise, the accused would be prosecuted. Witnesses were shown before being stopped. Identification Parade Neither the prosecution witnesses played any role with the accused at the time of its identification, nor did the magistrate holding the identification parade make any note in his report as to what role the accused had played during the incident and There was a report that the prosecutor responsible for the neglect failed to link the accused to the incident, was acquitted top advocate from Jandanwala lawyer