SHAUKAT JAVED FAROOQI versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Annual Secret Report Against A Government Employee In its Annual Secret Report, the Recording Officer acted as Judicial Magistrate as Reporting Officer (District and Sessions Judge) and inspected the High Court Verification Judge. Their instruction was recorded by. The civil servant did not allege that the two officers had been illegally disposed of on their behalf, with the top officers on the basis of individually taking notes and recording recorded incidents separately. The opinion of the source is, however, that the total effect of such events attracts the attention of the people before those persons who have been requested to be the sessions judge and chief justice of the district concerned. Prior to recording negative comments naturally, consultation requirements were not required to accurately assess work and behavior. The subordinate Judicial Officer was serving under him and he was the best judge of his work. For his opinion, the basis of abduction and character can be very broad, depending on his own observation, common reputation and so on. Other material of the information which is brought to his notice, therefore, cannot be said to constitute a substance on which, in his opinion, there is no basis for interference in the decision of the Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, for leave to appeal. Request dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Gharo lawyer