HASSAN RAZA versus STATE
Appreciating the evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/149, 324/149, 295/149 and 148 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 423 (1) (d), the witnesses were the natural witnesses of the incident who were present on the occasion. Eyewitnesses who had no motive for offering prayer that they had lied against the accused and presented their evidence in court and their evidence could be trusted to secure the conspiracy by the accused. Can be relied upon, who encouraged and encouraged it. The remaining suspects, beyond any ambiguity, in the horrific massacre proved that these individuals were killed by automatic weapons firing and their post-mortem performance, hence the prosecution's case. Cannot be fatal because only medical evidence can provide. Failure of a trial court to substantiate any particular charge against the individual or to substantiate the circumstantial evidence and to be particularly punishable. The accused, under section 109, PPC, had an error that could be remedied under the High Court section 423 (1) (d), CRPC, because it did not cause the suspect to commit terrorism. ? After understanding the rise in communal casualties and the alarming proportions in the country, severe punishment was required, with twenty-five of the thirty-nine witnesses appearing in court and even though they described the shootings as injuries, they Were scared to death. Despite the position of the assailants to identify them, the convictions and convictions sentenced by the trial court were retained, however, the PPC was adjourned.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Musakhel lawyer