MUHAMMAD RAFIQ, SUB-ENGINEER versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL
Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 9A [As entered into by the Armed Forces (Amendment Ordinance (IV of 1978) by mandatory service]) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (b) Enumeration of Employees' Services Seniority Benefit benefits from the withdrawal of Armed Forces A civil servant who served in the Armed Forces for more than four years as a doctoral doctor, followed by an open advertisement as a Medical Officer at B17 at Cantonment Board Hospital. Appointment and certification was made when the subsequent mandatory Section 9A was entered into the Service (Armed Forces) Ordinance, 1971, which saw doctors serving two years in the Armed Forces. Having served satisfactorily for a short time, he was entitled to count his services (in the Armed Forces) as his superannuation. The civil servant applied for the benefit which he later had for civil servants. The money withdrawn as a result of his seniority was withdrawn, he was ordered to be recovered from it, so that the services of counting in the armed forces could be taken advantage of. That after the release of the army, the civil servant entered the service of the Cantonment Board, which was neither federal nor provincial government service, Rutti was not entitled to count his services and pay for a legitimate civil servant who was released after his release. The Army Service joined the Cantonment Board, which was affiliated with the Defense Service, was a civil servant and other government officials. Like the employees, he was entitled to take advantage of his service in the Armed Forces for senior service, and the Federal Government's Employee Service Tribunal ruled against
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
