MUHAMMAD LTAMZAN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 157 and 173 of the Criminal Procedure (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 of the Investigations against which the FIR was lodged in Section 10 Offense (Enforcement Hood) ) The ordinance was 1979. On the basis of the report of the accused by the investigating officer on the request of Alibi by the Judicial Magistrate of Albi, the matter was again investigated by D-Section P and against the accused at the request of the complainant. Invoice presented in trial court. In this case, it was challenged by D-section P to re-investigate and submit the challan in connection with the investigation that the magistrate has released the accused, cannot be re-examined by D-section P. He was discharged without obtaining permission before the magistrate. While the FIR lodged against him by the magistrate, because the re-investigation was not canceled, Ian could not be barred under the law, the defendant could reasonably go to trial and prove his innocence. Will have full opportunity to do so.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Khyber Agency lawyer