STATE versus ASIF ALI ZARDARI
Pakistan Prison Rules 1978, 158, 152 and 161 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 439 accused transferred from one jail to another in a jail sessions court, where the accused were under trial when the two newspapers closed the pen. Later, through an unconstitutional order, the jail authorities were instructed not to transfer the accused to another jail without the permission of the court, according to press reports. On administrative grounds, Malir Jail to Central Jail, Karachi allegedly from Malir Jail to Central. The jail was being shifted to Karachi. 158 of the Pakistan Prison Rules gave the Inspector General (Prisons) the power to direct, by a general or special order, that any class or classes of prisoners may be imprisoned or imprisoned, or the Sessions Court in this regard. Has failed. Consider the law announced in SCMR 1527 in 1994 and incorrectly relied on RR 152 and 161 of the Pakistan Jail Rules, which did not apply to the case of accused W. Ho was still an interrogated prisoner, nor was the Criminal Inspector General (Jail) able to order the culprit to be transferred from Malir Jail to Central Jail, Karachi, where he was currently imprisoned. Should not have been approved. Sessions to confirm the news related to the matter, misread the provisions of Pakistan Jail Rules and endanger the life of a detained prisoner without taking into account other factors such as security, law and order situation. Random order resulted in the court being set aside and accordingly permission to request review
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer