Find a Lawyer

ALMAS JAVED versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE

Rr 6 8 (iv), 6 15 & 8 (viii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Disqualification and elimination of the result, the candidate actually got 658/1100 marks in the examination, but the board officials The result was obtained from the affidavit. Result card number was increased from 65 658 to 181818 and the candidate was charged with illegally obtaining marks. The candidate not only failed to answer the charge sheet, but the personal hearing. After failing to appear before disciplinary committee for disciplinary committee, after going on material off record, candidate found guilty and unable to appear for three exams Declared and as a result the candidate filed a constitutional petition in the High Court instead of filing a court appeal against the decision of the Disciplinary Committee which was dismissed, the decision of the Board against the candidate was not restored. Doubtless, but the possibility of regularity on what was not challenged on material authenticity was attached to all the official proceedings and not necessarily to the candidate by any official of the Board. Malala Fides was opposed to this. The candidate used the result card, which was a document attached to the examination and failed to prosecute it properly. For interference, the leave application for appeal was rejected famous high court advocate from Thana Bula Khan lawyer