STATE versus BENZAIR BHUTTO
12 (1) and (3) of the Accountability Act 1997. The jurisdiction of the court for its investigation cannot be investigated by the scope court, or by introducing the accused to the list of persons, with their own opinion with the prosecution and investigative authority. Can't change. After considering the evidence and the record, the prosecution is not so charged where the court empowers the person to impose a crime on him, then he is the chief accountability commissioner, accountability commissioner and accountability bureau / cell court. Will take over. The event, then the prosecutor and section 12, will be arranged to mediate the Accountability Act 1997, only to be used for the arrest of the accused as a suspect so that the identity of a party (false) or non-party (defendant) is defined. Can be corrected. The material and evidence to which a person has committed a crime is not valid under Section 12 of the Accountability Act 1997 to guarantee this result.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Gojra lawyer