MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XIII, R 2 The production of additional evidence of the constitutional application was denied by the trial court and the appeal filed was also dismissed. Was later received. The reception of the documents after the closure of the evidence depended on the departure of the court, where the evidence was authentic and the delays were negligible, when evidence was set for evidence in the evidence and when the case was rejected. There should be no objection to the presentation of An application for permission to submit additional evidence can be filed at any stage. Applicants were denied the production of additional evidence because they should have presented the same when presenting evidence of their affidavit. 21 6 was completed in 1995 and could not happen. Later, the trial court's view that he was allowed to appear in the trial was wrongfully passed another order. Ed was responsible for setting aside the two court orders below.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
