NADIR KHAN versus LIAQUAT ALI
The Code of Conduct 1908, Section 114 and O XLVII, R1, revised the High Court's decision on the basis that the High Court had dismissed the review without considering the evidence on record. Rejected, the petitioner had the petition reviewed and failed to present a case for interference in the review as the interference taken by him for review was not justified. The decision showed that the applicant's arguments were fully submitted to the petitioner. He did not allege Or was his lawyer paying attention to another argument. Aspects of this case, which were not dealt with by the High Court while rejecting the review, the High Court correctly found that there was an alleged lack of proper consideration of the evidence on record and that, The petitioner's counsel was not addressed without any argument; no legal basis was provided for the purpose of reviewing the High Court's decision, no interference was sought, the petition for revision theory was justified. Was deleted on
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Minchanabad lawyer
