SAMI ULLAH KHAN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bail Section H whose primary duty was to investigate the commission of identifiable offenses, it complied with its legal obligations and duties. The case was registered, it was also investigated and after the accused was charged, he then submitted his final report under 17 173, CCP Inspector General of Police, after that. At the request of the accused, a re-investigation was ordered and he was handed over to D-Section P. The Branch, which not only denied the prosecution's case but also terminated it completely, had any legal justification for ordering a re-investigation in the case that was once investigated and a final report for the trial. D-section P was presented in competent court. During the re-investigation based on his / her confidential information, the accused was found innocent and presented a supplementary challan against him, for example other people who were not the case for anyone, which was completely unnecessary and unnecessary. On reasonable grounds it was believed that the culprits were already guilty of the death penalty which prevented them from accepting bail, the accused was denied in bail matters.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Karak lawyer