Find a Lawyer

MUNIR MUSHTAQ versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Sections 32 (2) and 156, CL (14) Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 38 and 39 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Articles 164 and 161 of fraud and The misappropriation of the export is a confessional statement of exemption, which was considered under section 164, CRPC and qualified under Arts 38 and 39, Convention e testimony whether illegal or misleading and A statement of his own was made for the investigation, which charged the identity value. In spite of conflicting activities and despite the fact that the accused acted as a clearing agent, the accused, however, avoided the data as a clearing agent for the firms' disputed exports, as they revealed it was the accused's The skill is, the professional clearance agent on whom the other enticed himself to take advantage of the illegality and harm the revenue illegally, while assigning specific roles to the demonstrators for fraud and fraud. Also, out of the five firms yesterday, the accused did not care to explain that all such cases should be considered in a legal background, where the action was characterized by a prominent, judicial nature of the suicide attack. The criminal proceedings were not worth it to be so effectively dismissed as to how he was so fiercely charged and similar transactions were affirmed by the former party. In which the accused was found out by the accused's own illegal confessions. This charge collector will be charged to Customs Clicks, with or without a particular denial of the charges leveled against him. immigration advocates phone number from Rohri lawyer