Find a Lawyer

ZAKA ULLAH KHAN versus ZILA COUNCIL, KASUR

Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 Section 39 (1) (b) Punjab District Council (Consumer Goods Tax) Rules, 1990, R16 (1) (3) (8) and (9) Letters No. Section VI (LG) / 2 5 /, 97, dated 27 7 1998 1998 Government Government Local Government Local Local Local Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Local Government Rural Development Department 5 5 Security Amount Issued By The Rural Development Department The Fund's demand was challenged by the District Council for a fixed period by contractors, saying that the demand was illegal and disallowed because similarly the law was not approved, not the terms of the lease agreement given to the contractors. F Punjab was to be regular by the district council. ) Rules, 1990, but also in accordance with other terms and conditions which shall be conveyed by the Provincial Government through official instructions issued by Letter No. Section O VI (LG) 2 5/97, dated 27 7 1998 by the Contractor. 5% security was provided for filing before the US after the receipt of NGG goods collection tax was granted to the local councils to be calculated on the basis of claims from the contractor last year. Calc will receive some money to dispose of the refund claim as a fund so that the letter applies according to the instructions without any discrimination. Akh could contractor safety. Also, taxpayers were obliged, in the circumstances, to comply with 5% of the contractor's security as well as the instructions regarding the Exit Tax Challenge of goods related to receiving goods in exchange for a rotating fund, if in the circumstances the contractor was offended. So in the amount of revolving funds, they are the relevant administrators list of advocates from Jaranwala lawyer