Find a Lawyer

SAIF ULLAH versus STATE

Definition of Pakistan Panel Code Section 302 Evidence. The complainant, who did not fully endorse the version given in the FIR, was declared hostile on the occasion of the prosecution, his evidence had to be carefully examined, the second eyewitness to the incident, the real brother of the accused. Yes, he explicitly dismissed that it was the accused who had committed the murder of the deceased by blowing up an eyewitness, his credibility could not be affected, which led to the post-mortem of the late Discharged that he died of a wound. Her neck chemical inspector's report and serologist's report proved that the case was recovered from the suspect's statement that the human blood was stained. Ocular account O1 testimony was not merely evidence that the suspect was linked to the crime. , But the recovery of medical evidence and the evidence Cassie also linked the accused to the commission of the crime The fact that the complainant was not full y supported his own version presented in the FIR, does not mean The prosecution may have failed to prove the accused's prosecution, while the accused was involved in the murder of the trial court Was done property advocate from Jaja Abasian lawyer