NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BHAKKAR
Section 42 and 161 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application mutation, revocation of revocation by the Deputy Commissioner, Approval in favor of a validation mutation approved by the Revenue Officer, change by the respondents Appeal against Priority Assistant Commissioner / Collector was reviewed by the Deputy Commissioner / District Collector regarding the approval of the Revenue Officer's Appeal Order and the mutation was canceled even though the Deputy Commissioner of the district was the State Representative, yet he was unable to exercise his powers in the deputy commissioner of the province The Regulator may review at its own discretion or in accordance with its predecessor's law and not its subordinates, including the Revenue Officer Deputy Commissioner / District Collector, to entertain any application and pass any order against it. Is not authorized Revenue officer deputy commissioner's tune order regarding MOTA approval was exceptional
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Chak Sheza lawyer